|
|
Questioning
is a key aspect of the teaching and learning
process. There is evidence that teachers can improve their use
of questions, focusing on types of questions and strategies for using them.
Questions should draw pupils into the learning process as well as checking
on acquisition of knowledge.
Points Arising from Research
 |
Improving questioning was one of the keys to raising attainment
identified by
Black and Wiliam
in
Inside the Black Box
(see
Formative Assessment) |
 |
Teachers ask 300-400 questions per day (though
many of these are procedural |
 |
Most
teachers’ questions are lower-order. Increasing higher-order questions
to around 50% of the total can raise attainment and improve pupil
attitudes |
 |
Most
teachers’ questions are answered in less than a second, often by the
teacher him- or herself. Increasing wait time to 3 seconds for lower
order questions and 10 seconds for higher order ones improves the number
and quality of answers |
 |
Pupils
fear being made to look silly and this inhibits them in answering |
 |
The
importance of pupils articulating ideas themselves means that it is
important to try to get
them to ask questions |
 |
Low
ability and younger children benefit from questions after looking at
source material; high ability pupils benefit from being given questions
before source material |
 |
When
pupils ask questions this can lead to more talk, higher-level thinking
and can give social benefits
|
Key Elements of Questioning
Purpose of question:
 |
They can help the teacher gauge how effectively pupils are learning |
 |
They can assist the teacher in forward planning
|
 |
They can be used to involve pupils in on-going classwork |
 |
They can give pupils opportunities to articulate their understanding |
 |
They should give opportunities for successful answers, but should also
provide challenge |
 |
Pupils’ communication skills can be improved |
 |
Social skills can also be improved |
 |
Pupils can be invited to ask questions themselves, which can lead to more
sophisticated discussions |
 |
Pupils can be led to question their own learning and enter the realms of
metacognition (reflecting on the learning process), with wide-ranging
benefits |
Types of
questions:
 |
Lower-order
questions may simply call for a memorised fact; higher-order ones will
invite the pupil to explore an idea and give a more expansive answer |
 |
Closed questions
call for a simple factual response and may often be answered by “Yes” or
“No”; open questions invite a more extensive response, often without
“rightness” or “wrongness” being an issue |
 |
There are many
different ways of categorising types of questions, with Socratic
questioning being a specific example. This promotes the idea that pupils
should be encouraged to explore, to consider reasons and evidence, to
project forward to consider implications/consequences etc |
 |
One much-used system
of analysing questions is through Bloom’s Taxonomy... |
Bloom’s taxonomy:
 |
This divides types of learning into what may be seen as an ascending
hierarchy:
-
Knowledge (recall of factual information)
-
Comprehension (showing
understanding of the information recalled)
-
Application (consideration of practical
relevance of information)
-
Analysis (ability to investigate elements of
the information)
-
Evaluation (ability to make judgements about
the nature of information)
-
Synthesis (using information to move forward
in a creative way)
|
 |
Questions can be devised to cover these six areas in the teaching
process |
 |
This process allows for consideration of differentiation in formulation
of questions. Broadly, more able pupils should be encouraged
to explore the higher levels |
 |
In the planning process, the teacher may consider different types of
questions for the different types of learning |
Teacher
self-evaluation:
 |
It is believed to be
important that teachers take stock of their use of questions |
 |
How many questions
do we ask? |
 |
How many lower-order ones do we ask? |
 |
How many higher-order? |
 |
What wait time do we give? (i.e.
time allowed for a pupil to answer) |
 |
How do we respond to pupils’
responses? |
 |
To what extent do we encourage
pupils to formulate their own questions? |
 |
Do we wait for full attention from
the class before asking a question? |
 |
How often do we answer questions
ourselves? |
 |
How many different pupils answer
questions? |
 |
Are certain pupils invited to answer
repeatedly? Do some seldom/never answer? |
 |
How else do we invite responses,
apart from direct questions? |
Practical strategies:
 |
Invite pupils to
make up questions about a topic before it has been taught, promoting a
sense of enquiry |
 |
Use a “Question
Wall” or
“Question Box” where pupils can put questions which occur as a
block of work is in progress |
 |
When a pupil
answers, rather than commenting, invite another pupil to
|
 |
Set up pairs or
groups to answer more difficult questions
|
 |
Don’t allow a “hands
up” approach. Instead, nominate pupils to answer
|
 |
Set homework of
returning the next day with a question |
 |
Have pupils make up
questions for their peers on work in hand
|
 |
Give marks for good
questions rather than good answers
|
 |
When a question is proving difficult, ask
a pupil to ask the question again |
 |
For a difficult question, have pupils
write answers prior to class discussion of them
|
 |
When you ask a pupil a question, don’t
move towards the pupil, but move away so that the rest of the class
feels involved
|
 |
Use the recapping at the end of the
lesson to exploit question types |
 |
Similarly in the review session at the
beginning of the next lesson |
 |
Promote the idea of asking questions
through internet search engines |
 |
Invite a pupil to teach part of a lesson,
including appropriate questions |
 |
When a question is
proving difficult, ask a pupil to ask the question again |
 |
For a difficult
question, have pupils write answers prior to class discussion of them |
 |
Invite a pupil to
teach part of a lesson, including appropriate questions
|
Reflection and Discussion
Do you feel that your
use of questioning is varied and effective?
Are there ways in which you could consider developing your use of questions?
|
Some Activities
Relating To the Issue of Approaches to Questioning |
|
Key element |
Objective |
Action |
|
|
Some examples and
suggestions |
|
Purpose of Questioning |
Pupils can be invited to ask questions themselves |
Have groups work on different, narrowly
focused topics and make up questions for the rest of the class. Other groups then discuss the questions. |
|
Types of Questions |
Higher-order questions will invite the pupil to explore an idea and
give a more expansive answer. |
Ask pupils
(groups?) to consider questions of an extremely "woolly" nature, to
which you don't have an answer yourself. Make clear that you don't
"know the answer" and then have the class consider different
responses. |
|
Bloom's Taxonomy |
Differentiation in formulation of questions. |
In planning
a block of work, write down questions which would relate to each of the six
areas , trying to ensure that there is a question appropriate for every
level of ability in the class. |
|
Teacher
Self-Evaluation |
It is believed to
be important that teachers take stock of their use of questions. |
Have a colleague observe a lesson
with a checklist of things you wish to consider. Your colleague would record
data relating to these things in an objective way. Reciprocate. |
|
Practical
Strategies |
When a question is
proving difficult, ask a pupil to ask the question again. |
This may prove difficult,
suggesting that the class has not understood the question, so invite
discussion of where the problem lies. |
Selected References

Further Reading
Accelerated Learning in
Practice by Alistair Smith,
Network Educational Press; ISBN
1-855390485
Has a section giving practical suggestions as to how Bloom’s Taxonomy can
relate to classroom practice.
Lessons are for Learning
by Mike Hughes,
Network Educational Press; ISBN 1-855390388
Has a section on questioning techniques.

Websites
The following web sites contain
material related to questioning and suggest further internet exploration:
http://tep.uoregon.edu/services/newsletter/year93-94/issue18/questions.html
Try internet searches relating to the following schemes for considering
questioning:
Thinkers Keys
by Tony Ryan
Question Matrix
by Chuck Weiderhold
Divergent Thinking Model
by Wilson and Wing Jan
Six Thinking Hats
by Edward De Bono
Learning and Teaching Scotland
have sponsored work relating to questioning as part of their
Assessment is for Learning programme and this has resulted in
interesting case studies. The home web site address for this material is as
follows, but material is due to appear in the public domain in a more
accessible form than is the case at the time of writing.
www.ltscotland.org.uk/assess/
|